https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164927 A subsequent purchaser challenged an attachment notice and vacate direction affecting immovable property sold by the recorded defaulter. The court noted that the purchaser had promptly replied to the first notice asserting its purchase, but that reply was ignored before coercive action was taken; it also noted the unexplained delay in enforcement and the absence of steps to protect third parties by entering the tax charge in the sub-registrar's records. On these facts, the notices could not be sustained against the purchaser and were quashed, with liberty to proceed against the defaulting dealer and its properties in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Sep 2014 18:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164927 A subsequent purchaser challenged an attachment notice and vacate direction affecting immovable property sold by the recorded defaulter. The court noted that the purchaser had promptly replied to the first notice asserting its purchase, but that reply was ignored before coercive action was taken; it also noted the unexplained delay in enforcement and the absence of steps to protect third parties by entering the tax charge in the sub-registrar's records. On these facts, the notices could not be sustained against the purchaser and were quashed, with liberty to proceed against the defaulting dealer and its properties in accordance with law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164927