<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1024 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164920</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 15A(1)(o) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act was held unjustified where form XXXI, issued for the railway contract, was produced immediately before seizure and the goods were later released on security. The record did not support the finding of an intention to evade tax, because the form had been duly filled and furnished before seizure. On these facts, the penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 11:48:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1024 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164920</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 15A(1)(o) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act was held unjustified where form XXXI, issued for the railway contract, was produced immediately before seizure and the goods were later released on security. The record did not support the finding of an intention to evade tax, because the form had been duly filled and furnished before seizure. On these facts, the penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>