<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 173 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247246</link>
    <description>Refund of duty under Rule 173L depends on strict compliance with the prescribed procedure, including proper intimation, maintenance of accounts, separate storage, and timely completion of the return-and-reprocessing process. Where the assessee does not satisfy these statutory and procedural conditions, the refund claim is not admissible and may be rejected. The power to relax compliance under Rule 173L(4) is discretionary and requires a request and recorded reasons; it cannot be treated as automatic or invoked on the assessee&#039;s behalf. A distinction between substantive and procedural conditions does not displace the need to comply with the rule on the facts stated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 09:43:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 173 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247246</link>
      <description>Refund of duty under Rule 173L depends on strict compliance with the prescribed procedure, including proper intimation, maintenance of accounts, separate storage, and timely completion of the return-and-reprocessing process. Where the assessee does not satisfy these statutory and procedural conditions, the refund claim is not admissible and may be rejected. The power to relax compliance under Rule 173L(4) is discretionary and requires a request and recorded reasons; it cannot be treated as automatic or invoked on the assessee&#039;s behalf. A distinction between substantive and procedural conditions does not displace the need to comply with the rule on the facts stated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>