<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 170 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247243</link>
    <description>The Kerala High Court held that appeals against the order of the Appellate Tribunal under the Central Excise Act, 1944 were not maintainable. The Court ruled that questions concerning the rate of duty of excise were excluded from appeal to the High Court under Section 35G of the Act. The Court emphasized that the jurisdiction to decide on the levy of excise duty rested with the Supreme Court, not the High Courts. The Court rejected the appeals, allowing the Appellant to seek further recourse from the Supreme Court under Section 35L of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 170 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247243</link>
      <description>The Kerala High Court held that appeals against the order of the Appellate Tribunal under the Central Excise Act, 1944 were not maintainable. The Court ruled that questions concerning the rate of duty of excise were excluded from appeal to the High Court under Section 35G of the Act. The Court emphasized that the jurisdiction to decide on the levy of excise duty rested with the Supreme Court, not the High Courts. The Court rejected the appeals, allowing the Appellant to seek further recourse from the Supreme Court under Section 35L of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>