<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 168 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247241</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the requirement for the applicant to make a partial pre-deposit of 25% of the confirmed demand within eight weeks, with the remaining amount waived during the appeal&#039;s pendency. This decision was based on the applicant&#039;s misrepresentation of electricity consumption and sales, as well as previous legal precedents. Compliance with the pre-deposit was mandated by a specified date to ensure fairness and adherence to the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2014 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 168 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247241</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the requirement for the applicant to make a partial pre-deposit of 25% of the confirmed demand within eight weeks, with the remaining amount waived during the appeal&#039;s pendency. This decision was based on the applicant&#039;s misrepresentation of electricity consumption and sales, as well as previous legal precedents. Compliance with the pre-deposit was mandated by a specified date to ensure fairness and adherence to the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>