<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 165 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247238</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the appellants liable for aiding in the diversion of imported goods, resulting in the imposition of a reduced penalty under Sec. 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The decision emphasized the importance of vigilance in business transactions to prevent inadvertent engagement in unlawful activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 09:27:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 165 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247238</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the appellants liable for aiding in the diversion of imported goods, resulting in the imposition of a reduced penalty under Sec. 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The decision emphasized the importance of vigilance in business transactions to prevent inadvertent engagement in unlawful activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>