https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247235 The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to direct exporters to pay 50% of duty for failing to fulfill conditions in advance licenses. The Court found no arbitrariness in the Tribunal's decision and dismissed writ petitions challenging the order, stating that interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was not warranted unless the Tribunal's discretion was arbitrary or perverse. The exporters' appeals were dismissed by the Tribunal for failure to pre-deposit specified amounts within the deadline, leading to the filing of the writ petitions. en-us Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 May 2014 09:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247235 The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to direct exporters to pay 50% of duty for failing to fulfill conditions in advance licenses. The Court found no arbitrariness in the Tribunal's decision and dismissed writ petitions challenging the order, stating that interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was not warranted unless the Tribunal's discretion was arbitrary or perverse. The exporters' appeals were dismissed by the Tribunal for failure to pre-deposit specified amounts within the deadline, leading to the filing of the writ petitions. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247235