<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 151 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247224</link>
    <description>A treaty permanent establishment under Article 5(2)(j) of the India-US DTAA requires actual use of an installation or structure for exploration or exploitation of natural resources for more than 120 days in a twelve-calendar-month period. Mere readiness for use during repair or maintenance is not enough, and the meaning of &quot;used&quot; is to be taken from the treaty text without importing a broader definition from the Income-tax Act. On that interpretation, the assessee was not treated as having a permanent establishment in India on the basis alleged, and the finding in favour of the assessee was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 08:52:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 151 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247224</link>
      <description>A treaty permanent establishment under Article 5(2)(j) of the India-US DTAA requires actual use of an installation or structure for exploration or exploitation of natural resources for more than 120 days in a twelve-calendar-month period. Mere readiness for use during repair or maintenance is not enough, and the meaning of &quot;used&quot; is to be taken from the treaty text without importing a broader definition from the Income-tax Act. On that interpretation, the assessee was not treated as having a permanent establishment in India on the basis alleged, and the finding in favour of the assessee was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>