<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 149 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247222</link>
    <description>Commission paid to a non-resident agent for services rendered outside India in contacting and negotiating with foreign artists was not taxable in India under Article 18 of the Indo-UK DTAA, because the agent did not perform any personal activities in India as an entertainer or athlete. Documented reimbursement of travel and related performance expenses was likewise not treated as income derived from personal activities in India. As tax had already been deducted on the artists&#039; performance fees, the commission and reimbursement did not independently attract a withholding obligation. The revenue challenge therefore failed on the taxability and source-deduction issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 149 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247222</link>
      <description>Commission paid to a non-resident agent for services rendered outside India in contacting and negotiating with foreign artists was not taxable in India under Article 18 of the Indo-UK DTAA, because the agent did not perform any personal activities in India as an entertainer or athlete. Documented reimbursement of travel and related performance expenses was likewise not treated as income derived from personal activities in India. As tax had already been deducted on the artists&#039; performance fees, the commission and reimbursement did not independently attract a withholding obligation. The revenue challenge therefore failed on the taxability and source-deduction issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>