https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164889 The court found that the reassessment orders and demand notices issued by the third respondent were in violation of the principles of natural justice due to the impractical time frame provided for response, which was hindered by consecutive holidays. Emphasizing fair play and reasonableness, the court quashed the impugned orders and notices, directing the petitioner to file objections within two days for reconsideration by the third respondent. The decision did not address the petitioner's tax liability, and no costs were awarded. en-us Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 May 2014 16:38:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164889 The court found that the reassessment orders and demand notices issued by the third respondent were in violation of the principles of natural justice due to the impractical time frame provided for response, which was hindered by consecutive holidays. Emphasizing fair play and reasonableness, the court quashed the impugned orders and notices, directing the petitioner to file objections within two days for reconsideration by the third respondent. The decision did not address the petitioner's tax liability, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164889