<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 839 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164885</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that Section 194C of the Income Tax Act does not apply when the transaction is not a &quot;contract for carrying out works.&quot; The Court found the amendment inapplicable to the relevant period and dismissed the special leave petitions, affirming the High Court judgments. (2010 (8) TMI 839 - SC)</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 839 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164885</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that Section 194C of the Income Tax Act does not apply when the transaction is not a &quot;contract for carrying out works.&quot; The Court found the amendment inapplicable to the relevant period and dismissed the special leave petitions, affirming the High Court judgments. (2010 (8) TMI 839 - SC)</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>