<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1132 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164877</link>
    <description>Addition based on slips recovered during inspection may be sustained where the entries disclose business transactions and the assessee fails to produce evidence that they were private or unrelated to turnover. An equal addition towards probable omission cannot stand without supporting material or a reasoned basis, and it must be deleted when the record discloses no justification. Penalty under section 12(3) requires proof of wilful suppression to evade tax; where such suppression is not established and the explanation is rejected without reasons, the penalty is not leviable. The turnover addition was maintained, while the equal addition and penalty were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1132 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164877</link>
      <description>Addition based on slips recovered during inspection may be sustained where the entries disclose business transactions and the assessee fails to produce evidence that they were private or unrelated to turnover. An equal addition towards probable omission cannot stand without supporting material or a reasoned basis, and it must be deleted when the record discloses no justification. Penalty under section 12(3) requires proof of wilful suppression to evade tax; where such suppression is not established and the explanation is rejected without reasons, the penalty is not leviable. The turnover addition was maintained, while the equal addition and penalty were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>