https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164872 Revisional interference under section 86 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act is confined to a specific question of law, and vague or general grounds do not justify interference. On the facts, no arguable legal error was shown in the concurrent orders, so the revision was not maintainable on that basis. The authorities were also justified in allowing C-form benefit for goods used in construction activity, including diesel, LDO, furnace oil and related materials deployed for national highway construction, because the factual finding supported use for the relevant construction purpose and disclosed no legal error warranting revision. en-us Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164872 Revisional interference under section 86 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act is confined to a specific question of law, and vague or general grounds do not justify interference. On the facts, no arguable legal error was shown in the concurrent orders, so the revision was not maintainable on that basis. The authorities were also justified in allowing C-form benefit for goods used in construction activity, including diesel, LDO, furnace oil and related materials deployed for national highway construction, because the factual finding supported use for the relevant construction purpose and disclosed no legal error warranting revision. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164872