<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1501 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164851</link>
    <description>Concessional tax under section 3(5) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was available where the sold machinery fell within the Eighth Schedule and was used in the buyer&#039;s factory site within the State for manufacture of goods. The reverse osmosis plant machinery was treated as machinery worked by electricity and not specifically excluded, and its installation for recycling and purifying water used in textile dyeing satisfied the statutory use requirement. The phrase &quot;used in his factory site within the State for the manufacture of any goods&quot; was construed broadly to cover direct and indirect use. The assessee therefore met all conditions for the concessional rate, and the rejection by lower authorities was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1501 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164851</link>
      <description>Concessional tax under section 3(5) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was available where the sold machinery fell within the Eighth Schedule and was used in the buyer&#039;s factory site within the State for manufacture of goods. The reverse osmosis plant machinery was treated as machinery worked by electricity and not specifically excluded, and its installation for recycling and purifying water used in textile dyeing satisfied the statutory use requirement. The phrase &quot;used in his factory site within the State for the manufacture of any goods&quot; was construed broadly to cover direct and indirect use. The assessee therefore met all conditions for the concessional rate, and the rejection by lower authorities was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>