<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 767 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164820</link>
    <description>Tax liability on timber purchases from tea estates depended on proving that the timber fell within the notified category of sales from a private forest under section 3 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 read with the Gazette notification dated 23.11.1998. The notification shifted the point of taxation only where the factual foundation was established, namely that the timber came from a privately owned forest or another specified source. Because no material showed that the tea estates owned a private forest or that the timber purchased by the assessee originated from such a forest, the authorities were justified in levying tax under the normal incidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 767 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164820</link>
      <description>Tax liability on timber purchases from tea estates depended on proving that the timber fell within the notified category of sales from a private forest under section 3 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 read with the Gazette notification dated 23.11.1998. The notification shifted the point of taxation only where the factual foundation was established, namely that the timber came from a privately owned forest or another specified source. Because no material showed that the tea estates owned a private forest or that the timber purchased by the assessee originated from such a forest, the authorities were justified in levying tax under the normal incidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>