<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 966 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164809</link>
    <description>Galvanised iron pipe fittings used for water supply and sanitary purposes were held to fall outside the schedule entry for steel tubes and tube fittings because zinc coating gave them a distinct commercial identity and value-added character; they were instead classifiable under the separate entry for water supply and sanitary equipment and fittings. On a fresh assessment pursuant to an open remand, the assessing authority could also revise the rate of tax on the turnover, because the remand was unrestricted and permitted determination of the correct rate applicable to each commodity. The reassessment at the revised rate was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 966 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164809</link>
      <description>Galvanised iron pipe fittings used for water supply and sanitary purposes were held to fall outside the schedule entry for steel tubes and tube fittings because zinc coating gave them a distinct commercial identity and value-added character; they were instead classifiable under the separate entry for water supply and sanitary equipment and fittings. On a fresh assessment pursuant to an open remand, the assessing authority could also revise the rate of tax on the turnover, because the remand was unrestricted and permitted determination of the correct rate applicable to each commodity. The reassessment at the revised rate was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>