<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 141 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247214</link>
    <description>The appellate authority allowed Cenvat credit for various services but disallowed it for maintenance and repair services. The judgment relied on previous decisions to support the allowance of Cenvat credit. The appeals arising from the same impugned order were disposed of through a common order, with the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed and the Revenue&#039;s appeal rejected. The stay petition was also disposed of, concluding the legal proceedings on 17th April 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2014 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 141 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247214</link>
      <description>The appellate authority allowed Cenvat credit for various services but disallowed it for maintenance and repair services. The judgment relied on previous decisions to support the allowance of Cenvat credit. The appeals arising from the same impugned order were disposed of through a common order, with the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed and the Revenue&#039;s appeal rejected. The stay petition was also disposed of, concluding the legal proceedings on 17th April 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>