<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 137 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247210</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order directing the appellant, a Statutory Board, to deposit Rs.50,00,000/- as a pre-condition for maintaining an appeal against a service tax demand. The Court emphasized the mandatory nature of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, without exceptions for entities like the appellant, even if performing public functions. The Court clarified that the legislative intent requires pre-deposit as a prerequisite for appeals, with no scope for judicially creating exemptions not provided by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 137 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247210</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order directing the appellant, a Statutory Board, to deposit Rs.50,00,000/- as a pre-condition for maintaining an appeal against a service tax demand. The Court emphasized the mandatory nature of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, without exceptions for entities like the appellant, even if performing public functions. The Court clarified that the legislative intent requires pre-deposit as a prerequisite for appeals, with no scope for judicially creating exemptions not provided by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>