<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 133 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247206</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the petitioner, determining that the transaction involving the sale of plastic bags with printed names was not a works contract but a sale of goods. The Court upheld the assessment and penalty reduction decision, emphasizing the incidental nature of printing names on bags and citing legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 133 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247206</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the petitioner, determining that the transaction involving the sale of plastic bags with printed names was not a works contract but a sale of goods. The Court upheld the assessment and penalty reduction decision, emphasizing the incidental nature of printing names on bags and citing legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>