<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 132 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247205</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petition, emphasizing that the petitioner should have pursued statutory remedies such as filing appeals against assessment orders instead of seeking directions through writ petitions. The Court advised the petitioner to follow appropriate legal procedures for redressal and highlighted the importance of availing the statutory remedy of an appeal under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 132 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247205</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petition, emphasizing that the petitioner should have pursued statutory remedies such as filing appeals against assessment orders instead of seeking directions through writ petitions. The Court advised the petitioner to follow appropriate legal procedures for redressal and highlighted the importance of availing the statutory remedy of an appeal under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>