<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 132 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247205</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a recovery-related order was held not maintainable where the assessee had not first pursued the statutory appeal against the assessment order that gave rise to the recovery certificate. The Court noted that earlier objections had been considered only with limited liberty, and that the proper remedy against assessment-linked recovery action was to use the appellate mechanism under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008. As to the notice for another assessment year, the petitioner was permitted to file a reply and, if an adverse assessment order followed, challenge it in appeal. The extraordinary writ jurisdiction was therefore not invoked and the petition was not entertained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 132 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247205</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a recovery-related order was held not maintainable where the assessee had not first pursued the statutory appeal against the assessment order that gave rise to the recovery certificate. The Court noted that earlier objections had been considered only with limited liberty, and that the proper remedy against assessment-linked recovery action was to use the appellate mechanism under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008. As to the notice for another assessment year, the petitioner was permitted to file a reply and, if an adverse assessment order followed, challenge it in appeal. The extraordinary writ jurisdiction was therefore not invoked and the petition was not entertained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>