<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 129 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247202</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, remanding the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority for reconsideration of the admissibility of cenvat credit on outward transportation services. The delay of 20 days in filing the appeal was condoned due to satisfactory reasons provided by the appellant. The appellant must now provide documentary evidence to support their case as per judicial pronouncements and a CBCE circular clarifying the conditions for credit admissibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 12:11:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 129 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247202</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, remanding the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority for reconsideration of the admissibility of cenvat credit on outward transportation services. The delay of 20 days in filing the appeal was condoned due to satisfactory reasons provided by the appellant. The appellant must now provide documentary evidence to support their case as per judicial pronouncements and a CBCE circular clarifying the conditions for credit admissibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>