<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 124 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247197</link>
    <description>The Appeals were allowed by way of remand, directing the case to be reconsidered by the adjudicating authority in light of new evidence presented during Tribunal proceedings. The judgment emphasized the importance of a fair hearing and examination of all evidence before reaching a decision. The case was remitted back to the adjudicating Commissioner for a fresh decision, ensuring both parties are given a fair opportunity to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 124 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247197</link>
      <description>The Appeals were allowed by way of remand, directing the case to be reconsidered by the adjudicating authority in light of new evidence presented during Tribunal proceedings. The judgment emphasized the importance of a fair hearing and examination of all evidence before reaching a decision. The case was remitted back to the adjudicating Commissioner for a fresh decision, ensuring both parties are given a fair opportunity to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>