<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 121 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247194</link>
    <description>The Court directed the customs authority to consider the petitioner&#039;s request for release of the goods, hear the petitioner, the second respondent and other concerned parties, and pass a reasoned order on merits within eight weeks. The authority was required to take into account the order of the appellate tribunal while deciding the matter in accordance with law. The petition was thus disposed of on the basis of a limited direction for reconsideration rather than an adjudication on the release claim itself.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 121 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247194</link>
      <description>The Court directed the customs authority to consider the petitioner&#039;s request for release of the goods, hear the petitioner, the second respondent and other concerned parties, and pass a reasoned order on merits within eight weeks. The authority was required to take into account the order of the appellate tribunal while deciding the matter in accordance with law. The petition was thus disposed of on the basis of a limited direction for reconsideration rather than an adjudication on the release claim itself.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>