<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 118 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247191</link>
    <description>The court directed respondent No.4 to re-examine the petitioner&#039;s refund claim without limitations, requiring respondent No.5 to provide necessary documents. The court emphasized giving the petitioner a chance to present her case and submit essential documents. Any refund due should be repaid without interest. The court clarified that its decision does not set a precedent and disposed of the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 09:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 118 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247191</link>
      <description>The court directed respondent No.4 to re-examine the petitioner&#039;s refund claim without limitations, requiring respondent No.5 to provide necessary documents. The court emphasized giving the petitioner a chance to present her case and submit essential documents. Any refund due should be repaid without interest. The court clarified that its decision does not set a precedent and disposed of the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>