<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 111 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247184</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal on certain expense disallowances, reducing the disallowance amount to Rs. 25,000 out of the total debits of Rs. 41,410. The appeal on the loss on the sale of a depreciable asset was dismissed, considering it a capital loss. The matter of Premises User Expenses was remanded for further examination, and the appeal on Interest on Overdraft &amp;amp; Unsecured Loans was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 09:12:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 111 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247184</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal on certain expense disallowances, reducing the disallowance amount to Rs. 25,000 out of the total debits of Rs. 41,410. The appeal on the loss on the sale of a depreciable asset was dismissed, considering it a capital loss. The matter of Premises User Expenses was remanded for further examination, and the appeal on Interest on Overdraft &amp;amp; Unsecured Loans was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>