<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 110 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247183</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT (A)&#039;s order for Assessment Year 2003-04 and partly sustained the order for Assessment Year 2002-03, allowing the revenue&#039;s appeal for the former and partly allowing it for the latter. The penalties related to the disallowance of 100% depreciation on temporary constructions were upheld, while those related to the boundary wall depreciation and PF/ESI disallowances were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 09:12:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 110 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247183</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT (A)&#039;s order for Assessment Year 2003-04 and partly sustained the order for Assessment Year 2002-03, allowing the revenue&#039;s appeal for the former and partly allowing it for the latter. The penalties related to the disallowance of 100% depreciation on temporary constructions were upheld, while those related to the boundary wall depreciation and PF/ESI disallowances were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>