<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 98 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247171</link>
    <description>The Court held that the petitioner, a manufacturer of A.C. Sheets, was entitled to Input Tax Credit (ITC) as the exemption applied to manufacturers, not the goods themselves. The authorities&#039; denial of ITC was deemed incorrect, and the petitioner&#039;s revision petitions were allowed. Consequently, the impugned judgments and orders were quashed, granting relief to the petitioner without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 98 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247171</link>
      <description>The Court held that the petitioner, a manufacturer of A.C. Sheets, was entitled to Input Tax Credit (ITC) as the exemption applied to manufacturers, not the goods themselves. The authorities&#039; denial of ITC was deemed incorrect, and the petitioner&#039;s revision petitions were allowed. Consequently, the impugned judgments and orders were quashed, granting relief to the petitioner without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>