<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 96 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247169</link>
    <description>The Court held that the transfer of stock to a new firm constituted a sale, not covered by the compounding scheme accepted by both parties. The assessee&#039;s failure to account for remaining stock led to upholding tax liability on the transferred stock. The Court dismissed the revision, affirming the Revenue&#039;s decision to tax the remaining stock transferred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2014 19:04:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 96 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247169</link>
      <description>The Court held that the transfer of stock to a new firm constituted a sale, not covered by the compounding scheme accepted by both parties. The assessee&#039;s failure to account for remaining stock led to upholding tax liability on the transferred stock. The Court dismissed the revision, affirming the Revenue&#039;s decision to tax the remaining stock transferred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>