<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 95 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247168</link>
    <description>The court quashed the demand notice dated 16.02.1994 due to the violation of principles of natural justice and the inapplicability of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The writ petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded to either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 95 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247168</link>
      <description>The court quashed the demand notice dated 16.02.1994 due to the violation of principles of natural justice and the inapplicability of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The writ petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded to either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>