https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247157 The Company Judge found it just and equitable to wind up the respondent-company under relevant sections of the Companies Act. The Division Bench upheld the prima facie observations supporting the admission of the winding-up petition, dismissing respondent-company's appeals. Applications seeking appointment of a provisional liquidator and publication of citation were pending for further directions. Allegations of false statements and perjury by the petitioner were deemed unfounded. Respondent-company's applications were dismissed as attempts to prolong proceedings. The case was directed for further proceedings on provisional liquidator appointment and citation publication. en-us Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 May 2014 19:02:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247157 The Company Judge found it just and equitable to wind up the respondent-company under relevant sections of the Companies Act. The Division Bench upheld the prima facie observations supporting the admission of the winding-up petition, dismissing respondent-company's appeals. Applications seeking appointment of a provisional liquidator and publication of citation were pending for further directions. Allegations of false statements and perjury by the petitioner were deemed unfounded. Respondent-company's applications were dismissed as attempts to prolong proceedings. The case was directed for further proceedings on provisional liquidator appointment and citation publication. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247157