<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court erred by stating Tribunal&#039;s order was prospective; original 1990 registration certificate restored, amended version voided.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18399</link>
    <description>Registration certificate - Since the order passed by Tribunal restored the certificate of registration dated 06.12.1990 and quashed amended certificate of registration which operated retrospectively, High Court ought not to have observed that the order passed by Tribunal is prospective only - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2014 13:52:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2014 13:52:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court erred by stating Tribunal&#039;s order was prospective; original 1990 registration certificate restored, amended version voided.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18399</link>
      <description>Registration certificate - Since the order passed by Tribunal restored the certificate of registration dated 06.12.1990 and quashed amended certificate of registration which operated retrospectively, High Court ought not to have observed that the order passed by Tribunal is prospective only - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2014 13:52:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>