https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164800 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, ruling that the appellant's action seeking renewal of the lease did not meet the standards of fairness or reasonableness and was considered arbitrary. The Court found that the appellant's desire for renewal was not genuine, as evidenced by the failure to pay rent for 17 years and seeking to continue the lease at a nominal rent despite reduced business. The Court upheld the lower courts' decisions, emphasizing the need for executive actions to be fair and reasonable, subject to judicial review, and in line with constitutional rights. The appeals were dismissed with costs assessed at Rs. 50,000/-. en-us Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Jun 2014 15:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164800 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, ruling that the appellant's action seeking renewal of the lease did not meet the standards of fairness or reasonableness and was considered arbitrary. The Court found that the appellant's desire for renewal was not genuine, as evidenced by the failure to pay rent for 17 years and seeking to continue the lease at a nominal rent despite reduced business. The Court upheld the lower courts' decisions, emphasizing the need for executive actions to be fair and reasonable, subject to judicial review, and in line with constitutional rights. The appeals were dismissed with costs assessed at Rs. 50,000/-. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164800