<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 490 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164799</link>
    <description>SC held that Chhattisgarh State failed to properly scrutinize liquor license applications despite court directions, prioritizing revenue over constitutional duties under Article 47. The license period had expired, effectively defeating the writ petitioners&#039; purpose. The court expressed dismay at inadequate application scrutiny and the State&#039;s apparent focus on revenue collection rather than public health obligations. HC&#039;s earlier direction for fresh scrutiny did not include refund of substantial application fees collected. SC allowed appeals with directions for future compliance with constitutional mandates and proper adherence to liquor shop disposal rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 490 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164799</link>
      <description>SC held that Chhattisgarh State failed to properly scrutinize liquor license applications despite court directions, prioritizing revenue over constitutional duties under Article 47. The license period had expired, effectively defeating the writ petitioners&#039; purpose. The court expressed dismay at inadequate application scrutiny and the State&#039;s apparent focus on revenue collection rather than public health obligations. HC&#039;s earlier direction for fresh scrutiny did not include refund of substantial application fees collected. SC allowed appeals with directions for future compliance with constitutional mandates and proper adherence to liquor shop disposal rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>