<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 76 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247149</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not imposable as the assessee had taken a bona fide view, and there was no furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. The appeals were allowed, and the penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer were set aside. The Tribunal emphasized that merely making a claim not substantiated in law does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars, as established in a Supreme Court case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 76 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247149</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not imposable as the assessee had taken a bona fide view, and there was no furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. The appeals were allowed, and the penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer were set aside. The Tribunal emphasized that merely making a claim not substantiated in law does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars, as established in a Supreme Court case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>