<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 70 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247143</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the CIT was not justified in invoking the provisions of Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The AO&#039;s order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of revenue, and the deduction under Section 80IB (10) was valid despite the belated return. The Tribunal emphasized that provisions granting incentives should be construed liberally to advance the purpose of the legislation, and technicalities should not hinder the grant of such incentives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2014 09:22:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 70 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247143</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the CIT was not justified in invoking the provisions of Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The AO&#039;s order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of revenue, and the deduction under Section 80IB (10) was valid despite the belated return. The Tribunal emphasized that provisions granting incentives should be construed liberally to advance the purpose of the legislation, and technicalities should not hinder the grant of such incentives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>