<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 69 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247142</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing adjustments for cost allocation and cost recharges from associated enterprises were found to require fuller examination of invoices, allocation keys, service evidence, benefit test and benchmarking material; the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication. Consultancy expenditure on feasibility and viability studies for a proposed new unit also required fresh factual inquiry to determine whether it was revenue or capital in nature, including whether the project created a new asset, was abandoned, or was merely an expansion of existing business; the disallowance was set aside and restored for fresh decision. The penalty-related ground was not substantively adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2014 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 69 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247142</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing adjustments for cost allocation and cost recharges from associated enterprises were found to require fuller examination of invoices, allocation keys, service evidence, benefit test and benchmarking material; the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication. Consultancy expenditure on feasibility and viability studies for a proposed new unit also required fresh factual inquiry to determine whether it was revenue or capital in nature, including whether the project created a new asset, was abandoned, or was merely an expansion of existing business; the disallowance was set aside and restored for fresh decision. The penalty-related ground was not substantively adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>