<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 69 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247142</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, restoring the issues of cost allocation and cost recharges to the TPO for fresh adjudication. The consultancy charges issue was set aside to the AO for re-examination. The levy of interest and initiation of penalty proceedings were deemed consequential or premature, respectively. The order was pronounced on December 18, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2014 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 69 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247142</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, restoring the issues of cost allocation and cost recharges to the TPO for fresh adjudication. The consultancy charges issue was set aside to the AO for re-examination. The levy of interest and initiation of penalty proceedings were deemed consequential or premature, respectively. The order was pronounced on December 18, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>