<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 68 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247141</link>
    <description>The appellant challenged the Tribunal&#039;s order on pre-deposit under the Central Excise Act and Finance Act, seeking dispensation due to financial hardship. The Court found similarities with a previous case and modified the order, requiring a deposit of 35% of the credit availed on capital goods and a specified amount on inputs. The appellant was granted an extended time for deposit, and the appeal was disposed of without costs upon compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 68 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247141</link>
      <description>The appellant challenged the Tribunal&#039;s order on pre-deposit under the Central Excise Act and Finance Act, seeking dispensation due to financial hardship. The Court found similarities with a previous case and modified the order, requiring a deposit of 35% of the credit availed on capital goods and a specified amount on inputs. The appellant was granted an extended time for deposit, and the appeal was disposed of without costs upon compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>