<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 60 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247133</link>
    <description>The High Court held that an executive order cannot modify statutory rules and emphasized that statutory rules must be followed until formally amended. The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order, and directed the respondent to re-consider the petitioner&#039;s rebate claim based on the statutory provision, disregarding the conflicting executive order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 60 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247133</link>
      <description>The High Court held that an executive order cannot modify statutory rules and emphasized that statutory rules must be followed until formally amended. The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order, and directed the respondent to re-consider the petitioner&#039;s rebate claim based on the statutory provision, disregarding the conflicting executive order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>