<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 52 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247125</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the second respondent to cease coercive actions and refrain from taking any steps until the stay petition was resolved. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, aiming to uphold fairness and procedural justice for the petitioner amidst the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s delay in functioning due to lack of quorum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 19:28:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 52 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247125</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the second respondent to cease coercive actions and refrain from taking any steps until the stay petition was resolved. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, aiming to uphold fairness and procedural justice for the petitioner amidst the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s delay in functioning due to lack of quorum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>