<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 49 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247122</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(A) regarding the appeal against the disallowance of deduction u/s 80-IB for the AY 2003-04. The appellant&#039;s absence led to an ex parte decision. The tribunal considered conflicting judgments on the deduction issue and found in favor of the appellant, citing past penalty cancellations. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act on 7th March 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 16:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 49 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247122</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(A) regarding the appeal against the disallowance of deduction u/s 80-IB for the AY 2003-04. The appellant&#039;s absence led to an ex parte decision. The tribunal considered conflicting judgments on the deduction issue and found in favor of the appellant, citing past penalty cancellations. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act on 7th March 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>