<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 1014 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164796</link>
    <description>A forged driving licence does not acquire legal validity merely because it is renewed by a licensing authority; s.15 of the Motor Vehicles Act authorises renewal only of a licence issued under the Act and confers no power to renew a fake licence, so renewal cannot cure the initial illegality. The SC rejected the contrary view that renewal &quot;robes&quot; a forged licence with validity, holding that forgery remains null and void notwithstanding subsequent official action taken under a mistaken assumption of genuineness. Since the vehicle was driven by a person without a valid licence, the matter was remitted to the Tribunal to determine the insurer&#039;s right to recover from the vehicle owner the compensation already paid, without reopening the claimants&#039; entitlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 1014 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164796</link>
      <description>A forged driving licence does not acquire legal validity merely because it is renewed by a licensing authority; s.15 of the Motor Vehicles Act authorises renewal only of a licence issued under the Act and confers no power to renew a fake licence, so renewal cannot cure the initial illegality. The SC rejected the contrary view that renewal &quot;robes&quot; a forged licence with validity, holding that forgery remains null and void notwithstanding subsequent official action taken under a mistaken assumption of genuineness. Since the vehicle was driven by a person without a valid licence, the matter was remitted to the Tribunal to determine the insurer&#039;s right to recover from the vehicle owner the compensation already paid, without reopening the claimants&#039; entitlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>