<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1192 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164790</link>
    <description>Goods manufactured to a purchaser&#039;s specifications, dimensions and immediate-use requirements were held not to be rough cast iron castings under item 4(i) of the Second Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, because machining, processing or tailoring to specification takes the goods outside the declared-goods description. The Tribunal&#039;s higher-rate assessment was therefore upheld. It was also clarified that each assessment year is a separate unit in tax law, so the Department&#039;s acceptance of a view for one year does not bar appeals for later years. The assessee&#039;s challenge failed, and the tax treatment sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1192 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164790</link>
      <description>Goods manufactured to a purchaser&#039;s specifications, dimensions and immediate-use requirements were held not to be rough cast iron castings under item 4(i) of the Second Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, because machining, processing or tailoring to specification takes the goods outside the declared-goods description. The Tribunal&#039;s higher-rate assessment was therefore upheld. It was also clarified that each assessment year is a separate unit in tax law, so the Department&#039;s acceptance of a view for one year does not bar appeals for later years. The assessee&#039;s challenge failed, and the tax treatment sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>