<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1192 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164790</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, allowing appeals against revised assessment orders. The Court determined that the goods sold were finished products, not rough castings, influencing their classification for tax purposes. Penalties invoked by the assessing authority were set aside by the Tribunal and upheld by the Court. The Court clarified that each assessment year is independent, dismissing the assessee&#039;s argument against filing appeals. Emphasizing customer specifications and legal precedents, the Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ultimately dismissing the writ petitions and affirming the Tribunal&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1192 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164790</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, allowing appeals against revised assessment orders. The Court determined that the goods sold were finished products, not rough castings, influencing their classification for tax purposes. Penalties invoked by the assessing authority were set aside by the Tribunal and upheld by the Court. The Court clarified that each assessment year is independent, dismissing the assessee&#039;s argument against filing appeals. Emphasizing customer specifications and legal precedents, the Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ultimately dismissing the writ petitions and affirming the Tribunal&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>