<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 873 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164782</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the dealer should pay tax at the rate of ten percent of four percent under the Central Sales Tax Act, rather than ten percent of ten percent under the U.P. Trade Tax Act. The court emphasized harmonious interpretation of statutes and notifications to align with legislative intent, ensuring effective tax relief for industrial development. The Department&#039;s revision was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s legally correct interpretation consistent with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 19:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 873 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164782</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the dealer should pay tax at the rate of ten percent of four percent under the Central Sales Tax Act, rather than ten percent of ten percent under the U.P. Trade Tax Act. The court emphasized harmonious interpretation of statutes and notifications to align with legislative intent, ensuring effective tax relief for industrial development. The Department&#039;s revision was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s legally correct interpretation consistent with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>