<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 893 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164779</link>
    <description>The Karnataka HC upheld the assessing authority&#039;s decision that the petitioner, an advertising agency, was liable for turnover tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, as they were deemed a dealer based on their transactions with printers and customers. The Second Appellate Tribunal affirmed this decision, and the HC dismissed the petition, finding no reason to interfere with the lower court&#039;s rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 893 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164779</link>
      <description>The Karnataka HC upheld the assessing authority&#039;s decision that the petitioner, an advertising agency, was liable for turnover tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, as they were deemed a dealer based on their transactions with printers and customers. The Second Appellate Tribunal affirmed this decision, and the HC dismissed the petition, finding no reason to interfere with the lower court&#039;s rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>