<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 698 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164766</link>
    <description>Proof of suppression in inter-State purchases, coupled with incomplete accounts, permits rejection of the books and a best judgment turnover assessment. The assessing authority is not confined to adding only the exact value of the suppressed purchases actually detected, because border check-posts are not the only source for tracing goods movement and incomplete records undermine the credibility of the returns. Reliable materials may be used to estimate turnover under section 17(3) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The earlier view limiting additions to the quantified suppression was rejected as unrealistic and incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 698 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164766</link>
      <description>Proof of suppression in inter-State purchases, coupled with incomplete accounts, permits rejection of the books and a best judgment turnover assessment. The assessing authority is not confined to adding only the exact value of the suppressed purchases actually detected, because border check-posts are not the only source for tracing goods movement and incomplete records undermine the credibility of the returns. Reliable materials may be used to estimate turnover under section 17(3) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The earlier view limiting additions to the quantified suppression was rejected as unrealistic and incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>