<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 941 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164764</link>
    <description>The High Court of Kerala held that when accounts are incomplete due to material defects like suppression of purchases or sales, the assessing officer can reject books and estimate turnover based on statutory principles. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to make additions to the assessee&#039;s turnover and tax liability based on check-post declarations, emphasizing the legality of best judgment assessments grounded in rationality. The court ruled against the assessee, affirming the assessing authority&#039;s discretion in conducting assessments within legal boundaries and established principles, resulting in the rejection of the revision petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 941 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164764</link>
      <description>The High Court of Kerala held that when accounts are incomplete due to material defects like suppression of purchases or sales, the assessing officer can reject books and estimate turnover based on statutory principles. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to make additions to the assessee&#039;s turnover and tax liability based on check-post declarations, emphasizing the legality of best judgment assessments grounded in rationality. The court ruled against the assessee, affirming the assessing authority&#039;s discretion in conducting assessments within legal boundaries and established principles, resulting in the rejection of the revision petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>