<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1188 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164757</link>
    <description>For liability under entry 57(i) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, the turnover threshold of twenty lakhs rupees is to be tested on the dealer&#039;s aggregate turnover across all branches, not on the turnover of each individual hotel or restaurant. The court treated the hotel or restaurant as the relevant business unit, read &quot;turnover&quot; in section 2(xxvii) as the dealer&#039;s total sales, and noted that the Act contemplates a single registration with branch registrations. The earlier view excluding turnover from other branches or other goods sold in the hotel while testing the threshold was held incorrect and overruled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1188 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164757</link>
      <description>For liability under entry 57(i) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, the turnover threshold of twenty lakhs rupees is to be tested on the dealer&#039;s aggregate turnover across all branches, not on the turnover of each individual hotel or restaurant. The court treated the hotel or restaurant as the relevant business unit, read &quot;turnover&quot; in section 2(xxvii) as the dealer&#039;s total sales, and noted that the Act contemplates a single registration with branch registrations. The earlier view excluding turnover from other branches or other goods sold in the hotel while testing the threshold was held incorrect and overruled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>