https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164754 The Court set aside the reassessment order and demand notice issued under the KVAT Act, 2003 due to the respondent's failure to consider the petitioner's requests for time and personal hearing. The Court emphasized the necessity of affording a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner before passing such orders. The writ petitions were allowed in part, with the reassessment order being quashed and the matter remitted back to the respondent for reconsideration. The respondent was directed to conduct a fair inquiry, provide a hearing to the petitioner, and make a decision in accordance with the law within four weeks. en-us Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Nov 2014 11:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164754 The Court set aside the reassessment order and demand notice issued under the KVAT Act, 2003 due to the respondent's failure to consider the petitioner's requests for time and personal hearing. The Court emphasized the necessity of affording a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner before passing such orders. The writ petitions were allowed in part, with the reassessment order being quashed and the matter remitted back to the respondent for reconsideration. The respondent was directed to conduct a fair inquiry, provide a hearing to the petitioner, and make a decision in accordance with the law within four weeks. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164754