https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164747 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the petitioner's construction activities constituted "works contracts" under the VAT Act, 2005, and were subject to trade tax. The orders issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, were deemed lawful, and the petitioner was held responsible for tax payment under the compounding scheme. The court highlighted that the petitioner should have pursued statutory appeals instead of opting for a writ petition. en-us Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164747 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the petitioner's construction activities constituted "works contracts" under the VAT Act, 2005, and were subject to trade tax. The orders issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, were deemed lawful, and the petitioner was held responsible for tax payment under the compounding scheme. The court highlighted that the petitioner should have pursued statutory appeals instead of opting for a writ petition. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164747