<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 29 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247102</link>
    <description>Damaged refractory bricks resold by a consignment agent were not treated as taxable sales turnover where the record did not establish ownership-based purchase and sale or the actual sale consideration; the amount recovered from the principal as compensation, including the difference between original value and resale value, could not be brought to tax as a sales omission. The penalty also failed because it was founded on the same unsustainable omission and no independent basis remained once the turnover addition was rejected. The Madras HC therefore set aside the assessment addition and consequential penalty in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 10:39:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 29 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247102</link>
      <description>Damaged refractory bricks resold by a consignment agent were not treated as taxable sales turnover where the record did not establish ownership-based purchase and sale or the actual sale consideration; the amount recovered from the principal as compensation, including the difference between original value and resale value, could not be brought to tax as a sales omission. The penalty also failed because it was founded on the same unsustainable omission and no independent basis remained once the turnover addition was rejected. The Madras HC therefore set aside the assessment addition and consequential penalty in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>